Primary and acute care
Advanced practice expert witnesses
Listed advanced practice expert witnesses address care delivered by practitioners working at an extended level of clinical responsibility, including assessment, diagnosis, prescribing and discharge. The relevant question is the standard expected of that role, not of a doctor performing the same task.
01
The evidence
What an advanced practice expert witness is asked to determine
Advanced clinical practitioners come from nursing, pharmacy, paramedic and allied health backgrounds, and their scope is set by employer governance, professional registration and the capability framework they were working to. An instruction should identify the role held, the supervision arrangements in place and the decision under scrutiny.
- What clinical scope the practitioner held at the relevant date, and what governance or supervision applied to it.
- Whether the assessment, diagnosis or treatment plan met the standard expected of a competent practitioner in that role.
- Whether escalation to a supervising clinician was indicated by the findings recorded.
- Whether prescribing, referral or discharge decisions fell within the practitioner’s scope and were adequately documented.
- Where the practitioner’s own registrant standards end and an employer governance question begins.
Practitioners are listed across the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Location can be narrowed in the register’s location listings before an instruction is made.
Claim contexts
Claims that instruct this discipline
These links describe the question advanced practice evidence can answer. They do not prescribe the scope of an individual instruction.
Clinical negligence claims
Assessment, prescribing and discharge decisions taken in an extended clinical role.
View claim type → 02Personal injury claims
Injury assessment and treatment carried out by a practitioner working at advanced level.
View claim type → 03Inquests
Evidence on scope of practice and escalation where a death is being investigated.
View claim type →Search the register by the discipline used in the instruction.
See advanced practice listingsReport routes
Reports prepared
Scope-of-practice questions are commonly answered from documents, and a records review report can address the consultation record, governance material and prescribing entries. A breach and causation report separates the standard expected of the role from the consequence alleged.
Where the instruction concerns a practitioner registered with a different regulator, the applicable standards should be identified in the report rather than assumed. The relevant report page sets out what the route requires.
Advanced practice expert witness evidence
An advanced practice expert witness gives an opinion on the standard expected of the specific extended role held, judged against the framework, registration and local governance applying at the relevant date.
The register lists practitioners by discipline and location; terms are agreed with the practitioner, not with the register. See the NHS England advanced practice information alongside the case material.
Directory search
Advanced Practice listings
Advanced Practice Expert Witness Cases & Claims
Related expert witness specialties
Questions answered
Frequently asked questions
Will an Advanced Practice expert witness respond to Part 35 questions?
Yes - CPR 35.6 entitles the parties to put written questions on a report, and answering them is part of the expert's duty to the court. A Advanced Practice report prepared for proceedings in England and Wales carries the Part 35 statement of truth, with equivalent duties applying in the other UK jurisdictions.
Can an Advanced Practice expert act as a single joint expert?
Where the court directs a single joint expert under CPR 35.7, the instruction is agreed between the parties and put jointly - a routine basis of instruction in this field. Whether a particular practitioner accepts SJE appointments is confirmed with the practitioner at the enquiry stage.
Will the expert attend joint discussions or give evidence at trial?
Where the court directs discussions between experts under CPR 35.12, they meet and produce a joint statement of what is agreed and what is disputed; attendance at trial - in person or by video link - is likewise a matter of court direction. These commitments are confirmed with the practitioner at instruction.
Can I choose an Advanced Practice expert of a specific gender, or one who assesses remotely?
Yes on both counts. Every listing displays the practitioner's gender, consulting locations and assessment types - face to face, remote or both - so sensitive-instruction preferences can be applied at the shortlisting stage, before any contact is made.